Aol accept spf fail and you see notify of there fails

On May 12, 2014 5:12:42 AM CEST, Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss 
<dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
>Look at the ruf= address and where it was sent.  No.  Not what I
>requested.
>
>Scott K
>
>On Monday, May 12, 2014 11:07:59 you wrote:
>> You have p=none and ruf= turned on, AOL's doing exactly what you've
>> requested.
>> 
>> - Roland
>> 
>> On 05/12/2014 10:25 AM, Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss wrote:
>> > Over the last few days I've gotten a number of bounces like this,
>all from
>> > AOL:
>> > 
>> > Return-Path: <>
>> > Received: from imb-d04.mx.aol.com (imb-d04.mx.aol.com
>[205.188.128.65])
>> > 
>> >    by qs3710.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51A76125427
>> >    for <i...@kitterman.com>; Sun, 11 May 2014 13:05:39 -0400 (EDT)
>> > 
>> > Received: from mtaig-mca02.mx.aol.com (mtaig-mca02.mx.aol.com
>> > [172.26.221.66])> 
>> >    (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
>> >    (No client certificate requested)
>> >    by imb-d04.mx.aol.com (AOL Mail Bouncer) with ESMTPS id
>12B0E38000AA
>> >    for <i...@kitterman.com>; Sun, 11 May 2014 13:05:39 -0400 (EDT)
>> > 
>> > Received: by mtaig-mca02.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound)
>> > 
>> >    id 0400770000087; Sun, 11 May 2014 13:05:39 -0400 (EDT)
>> > 
>> > Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 13:05:39 -0400 (EDT)
>> > From: mailer-dae...@aol.com (Mail Delivery System)
>> > Subject: Successful Mail Delivery Report
>> > To: i...@kitterman.com
>> > Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
>> > MIME-Version: 1.0
>> > Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
>> > 
>> >    boundary="8C34370000094.1399827939/mtaig-mca02.mx.aol.com"
>> > 
>> > Message-Id: <20140511170539.0400770000...@mtaig-mca02.mx.aol.com>
>> > 
>> > This is a MIME-encapsulated message.
>> > 
>> > --8C34370000094.1399827939/mtaig-mca02.mx.aol.com
>> > Content-Description: Notification
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> > 
>> > Your message was successfully delivered to the destination(s)
>> > listed below. If the message was delivered to mailbox you will
>> > receive no further notifications. Otherwise you may still receive
>> > notifications of mail delivery errors from other systems.
>> > 
>> > Please direct further questions regarding this message to your
>e-mail
>> > administrator.
>> > 
>> > --AOL Postmaster
>> > 
>> > 
>> > <erica.bbr...@aim.com>: alias expanded
>> > 
>> > --8C34370000094.1399827939/mtaig-mca02.mx.aol.com
>> > Content-Description: Delivery report
>> > Content-Type: message/delivery-status
>> > 
>> > Reporting-MTA: dns; mtaig-mca02.mx.aol.com
>> > X-Internet-Inbound-Queue-ID: 8C34370000094
>> > X-Internet-Inbound-Sender: rfc822; i...@kitterman.com
>> > Arrival-Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 13:05:38 -0400 (EDT)
>> > 
>> > Final-Recipient: rfc822; erica.bbr...@aim.com
>> > Original-Recipient: rfc822;erica.bbr...@aim.com
>> > Action: expanded
>> > Status: 2.0.0
>> > Diagnostic-Code: X-Internet-Inbound; alias expanded
>> > 
>> > --8C34370000094.1399827939/mtaig-mca02.mx.aol.com
>> > Content-Description: Message Headers
>> > Content-Type: text/rfc822-headers
>> > 
>> > Return-Path: <i...@kitterman.com>
>> > Received: from are-financed-errors.oilbrooklyn.com (safety-good-
>> > sparkprovo.oilbrooklyn.com [199.175.55.32])
>> > 
>> >    by mtaig-mca02.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id
>8C34370000094
>> >    for <erica.bbr...@aim.com>; Sun, 11 May 2014 13:05:38 -0400 (EDT)
>> > 
>> > Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 06:30:50 CDT
>> > Mime-Version: 1.0
>> > X-MSGID:1
>> > Content-Type: text/html
>> > From:  Loan Department. <i...@kitterman.com>
>> > To: erica.bbr...@aim.com
>> > Subject:  RE:Congratulations erica.bbrown $9500 Available For You!
>> > x-aol-global-disposition: S
>> > X-AOL-SCOLL-DMARC: mtaig-mca02.mx.aol.com ; domain : kitterman.com
>;
>> > policy : none ; result : F
>> > Authentication-Results: mx.aol.com;
>> > 
>> >    spf=fail (aol.com: the domain kitterman.com reports that
>199.175.55.32 is
>> > 
>> > explicitly not authorized to send mail using it's domain name.)
>> > smtp.mailfrom=kitterman.com;
>> > 
>> >    dmarc=fail (aol.com: the domain kitterman.com reports that Neither
>SPF
>> >    nor
>> > 
>> > DKIM align.) header.from=kitterman.com;
>> > X-AOL-REROUTE: YES
>> > x-aol-sid: 3039ac1add42536fade22f5e
>> > X-AOL-IP: 199.175.55.32
>> > X-AOL-SPF: domain : kitterman.com SPF : fail
>> > 
>> > --8C34370000094.1399827939/mtaig-mca02.mx.aol.com--
>> > 
>> > Dear AOL: please stop.  This is brain dead.  In case anyone is
>wondering,
>> > no one from i...@kitterman.com sent erica.bbrown any mail telling
>here we
>> > had $9500 available for her.
>> > 
>> > I don't know for sure if this is related to DMARC or not, but the
>timing
>> > seems to be roughly in line with their rollout of DMARC p=reject.
>> > 
>> > I have more if anyone wants to see them.
>> > 
>> > Scott K
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > dmarc-discuss mailing list
>> > dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
>> > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>> > 
>> > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note
>Well
>> > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
>_______________________________________________
>dmarc-discuss mailing list
>dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
>http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>
>NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
>terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to