>As is standard settings in lot of AV mailscanners to not allow >attachments as example with a .com in it. >Therefore it is not a good idea that google is sending attachments DMARC >with these filename !google.com!domain.comgjdsadg6777.zip bacause of >the .com names in it these are rejected in lot of AVscanners standard >server settings for them, see also directadmin forum for that rejects >frozen mail queu and so on. >Please dont put a dotcom in the filenames attachment.
The format of DMARC reports has been unchanged for several years, and there is software that expects the filenames the way they are now. Honestly, any AV scanner that depends on the filename is pretty useless, since malware can and does trivially avoid it by using a different name. I'd suggest first arranging to send your DMARC reports to an address with no content filters so your automated anaylsis software can handle it, and look for more modern AV software. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
