Yes, the slash is mandatory. From RFC 2045 5.1:
content := "Content-Type" ":" type "/" subtype
*(";" parameter)
; Matching of media type and subtype
; is ALWAYS case-insensitive.
- Roland
Roland Turner | Labs Director
Singapore | M: +65 96700022
roland.tur...@trustsphere.com
________________________________________
From: dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org> on behalf of Murray
Kucherawy via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org>
Sent: Thursday, 12 November 2015 07:05
To: A. Schulze; dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] rddmarc & comcast reports
That has to be a syntax error.
On 11/10/15, 12:02 AM, "dmarc-discuss on behalf of A. Schulze via
dmarc-discuss" <dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org on behalf of
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>I noticed last week rddmarc fail to read aggregated reports from Comcast.
>They send an unusual Content-Type: application-x-gzip;
>No idea if that's right or wrong. The attached patch extend rddmarc to
>import
>these reports.
>
>Andreas
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
