On May 13, 2016 5:20:58 PM EDT, "A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss" <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > > >Am 13.05.2016 um 23:10 schrieb Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss: >> I think RFC 7489, paragraph 3.1.2 is very explicit about this. It is >supposed to pass and if it doesn't it's a bug. > >you mean "RFC5321.HELO identity is not ... used exept when required to >"fake" an otherwise null reverse-path" ?
Yes. It's a not very precise rephrasing of what RFC 4408/7208 say. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
