On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 8:56 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
> Hi, > > it would be much more real-life to exemplify directing /aggregate/ > reports to third parties, which is quite common. Directing failure > reports to third parties would be a privacy nightmare. > > I'd suggest turning the subsection from ruf= to rua=. Indeed, the spec > for Verifying External Destinations is Section 3 of the > aggregate-reporting I-D. Perhaps the whole B.2.3 should be moved there > as well. > > There are a number of vendors acting as third-party DMARC report consumers for both aggregate and failure reports, though, so I submit that it is "real-life" to exemplify directing failure reports to third parties. -- Todd Herr | Technical Director, Standards & Ecosystem Email: todd.h...@valimail.com Phone: 703-220-4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
