On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 01:15:27PM -0400, PGNet Dev wrote:
There's no sound reason -- technical or otherwise -- of not providing perfectly 
legitimate infrastructure-config choices to the admin, and an option to 
override default behaviors.
Especially when the override is of defaults that are questionable, 
internally-made assumptions in the 1st place.


There most certainly is a sound reason, which is that it is code that would 
need to be written and maintained in order to solve a problem that is at least 
arguably user error.  If the admin specifies a name rather than an IP address, 
and that name resolves to multiple addresses (whether they be different 
families of address is irrelevant), then the software is entirely correct in 
deciding to use any of those addresses in whatever order it wants.  If you want 
to route around the DNS because of breakage in your local configuration, use a 
specific address or create a name that contains only the addresses you want. It 
is unreasonable instead to impose a burden of maintenance on the dovecot 
developers, or the penalty of poorly-exercised code (since this is, frankly, a 
corner case) on all the users.

Regards,

A
--
Andrew Sullivan
a...@crankycanuck.ca

Reply via email to