On 2023-07-27 19:21:03, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_te_rd_ptr_irq() function uses neither hw_intf
> nor hw_pp data, so we can drop the corresponding check.
Maybe because it would catch "bogus" interrupts, or these blocks are
accessed somewhere down the line in the vblank callback chain? I have
no clue :)
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suij...@somainline.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
> index 60d4dd88725e..04a1106101a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
> @@ -108,14 +108,6 @@ static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_te_rd_ptr_irq(void *arg)
> struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_enc = arg;
> struct dpu_encoder_phys_cmd *cmd_enc;
>
> - if (phys_enc->has_intf_te) {
> - if (!phys_enc->hw_intf)
> - return;
> - } else {
> - if (!phys_enc->hw_pp)
> - return;
> - }
> -
> DPU_ATRACE_BEGIN("rd_ptr_irq");
> cmd_enc = to_dpu_encoder_phys_cmd(phys_enc);
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>
