Am 05.05.24 um 16:08 schrieb Tetsuo Handa:
Since commit a6aa8fca4d79 ("dma-buf/sw-sync: Reduce irqsave/irqrestore from
known context") by error replaced spin_unlock_irqrestore() with
spin_unlock_irq() for both sync_debugfs_show() and sync_print_obj() despite
sync_print_obj() is called from sync_debugfs_show(), lockdep complains
inconsistent lock state warning.
Use plain spin_{lock,unlock}() for sync_print_obj(), for
sync_debugfs_show() is already using spin_{lock,unlock}_irq().
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+a225ee3df7e7f9372...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a225ee3df7e7f9372dbe
Fixes: a6aa8fca4d79 ("dma-buf/sw-sync: Reduce irqsave/irqrestore from known
context")
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
---
drivers/dma-buf/sync_debug.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_debug.c b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_debug.c
index 101394f16930..237bce21d1e7 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_debug.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_debug.c
@@ -110,12 +110,12 @@ static void sync_print_obj(struct seq_file *s, struct
sync_timeline *obj)
seq_printf(s, "%s: %d\n", obj->name, obj->value);
- spin_lock_irq(&obj->lock);
+ spin_lock(&obj->lock); /* Caller already disabled IRQ. */
list_for_each(pos, &obj->pt_list) {
struct sync_pt *pt = container_of(pos, struct sync_pt, link);
sync_print_fence(s, &pt->base, false);
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&obj->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&obj->lock);
}
static void sync_print_sync_file(struct seq_file *s,
