Hi Mark, Thanks for your info. I'll take this into account.
btw: do you get duplicate mails? (I sent the first mail via a mail client.) If yes, sorry about that. On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Mark Atwood <m...@mark.atwood.name> wrote: > Though I have already started working on the filesystem plugin idea, I >> doubt that this plugin is VERY useful to users of drizzle. How do you take >> this? In this respect, do you think the column-based archive storage engine >> would benefit drizzle community more than filesystem engine? >> >> > The filesystem based one would be useful for two reasons. > > It would make a much better "example" template for storage engines than the > current storage engines, and thus spur the development of still more storage > engines. > > And a filesystem based storage engine would be useful on clustered > filesystem appliances, such as Isilon and NetApp fileservers, which are > currently not very good for storage engines such as InnoDB. > -ZQ
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : drizzle-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
