I'll try it out tomorrow, in case of an error I'll provide you with the necessary dmesg output. Which kernel version is to be used with this patch?
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Michael Halcrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 7. April 2008 17:14 An: Benedikt Driessen Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ecryptfs-users@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [Ecryptfs-devel] Fixed?! On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 03:31:53PM +0200, Benedikt Driessen wrote: > Starting ecryptfsd (the one from the git-repository) with both patches > applied to 2.6.24 results in a kernel-oops (which is an improvement, > at least not the whole system crashes..). One of these days I am going to learn to test even my most trivial changes. I added a try_module_get() at the last minute to prevent the module from being unloaded while a daemon has its handle open. I assumed non-zero was an error code for that function call; it turns out that zero is the error condition. That flub is fixed in this version of the patch: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-procfs-kernel-20080407.tx t Mike
PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________ eCryptfs-users mailing list eCryptfs-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecryptfs-users
