On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Michael Halcrow wrote: -> It is inappropriate to use procfs for communications with a userspace -> daemon. Plus, there is no point in generating a separate handle for -> each daemon; the daemons can all multiplex on a single device handle -> instead.
It seems odd to have a /dev entry for ecryptfs when it's not a device. Wouldn't sysfs, possibly along with configfs (/usr/src/linux/Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt) be better suited? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ eCryptfs-users mailing list eCryptfs-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecryptfs-users
