On 05/15/2018 12:06 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:

<Big Snip>

>   Modules
> 
>     EPIC-6
> 
>    Because EL-6’s tooling is locked at this point, it does not make
>    sense to investigate modules.
> 
>     EPIC-7
> 
>    Currently EL-7 does not support Fedora modules and would require
>    updates to yum, rpm and other tools in order to do so. If these
>    show up in some form in a future minor release, then trees for
>    modules can be created and builds done.
> 


I *think* the version of rpm has been bumped enough as of EL 7.5 to
support the tooling needed for modules. This would clearly need to be
verified, but if this is the case then modern version of dnf may be all
that's required.


>     EPIC-next
> 
>    The tooling for modules can match how Fedora approaches it. This
>    means that rules for module inclusion will be similar to package
>    inclusion.  EPIC-next modules must not replace/conflict with CentOS
>    modules. They may use their own namespace to offer newer versions
>    than what is offered and those modules may be removed in the next
>    minor release if CentOS offers them then.
> 


-- 
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to