On 04. 05. 22 15:40, Troy Dawson wrote:
I just want to make sure that you are querying RHEL 9.0 and not 9.1.
Well, I was querying 9.1, so you have a point. However, with 9.0 it is almost
the same:
$ comm -12 <(repoquery -q
--repo=RHEL9.0-{BaseOS,AppStream,CRB,HighAvailability} -a | pkgname | sort |
uniq ) <(repoquery -q --repo=epel9 -a | pkgname | sort | uniq)
libwmf
libwmf-lite
pybind11-devel
python3-pybind11
tesseract
tesseract-devel
tesseract-langpack-eng
tesseract-tessdata-doc
$ comm -12 <(repoquery -q
--repo=RHEL9.0-{BaseOS,AppStream,CRB,HighAvailability}-source -a | pkgname |
sort | uniq ) <(repoquery -q --repo=epel9-source -a | pkgname | sort | uniq)
libwmf
pybind11
tesseract
tesseract-tessdata
The only difference I can spot is anthy-unicode-devel and
double-conversion-devel, which apparently might be allowed in EPEL 9 for now.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
