>> I'll argue that whichever it is, it is also a mis-feature. > > Right. The "problem" is in the way how signing is implemented in the > transport (redirecting the SMTP DATA output stream to an extra fd). > While it would be possible to chain both functions, performance would > really suffer. I'd need to merge both functions and calculate both > hashes at the same time. I can't promise any progress before end of > next week though. > >> Besides presenting a use-case and rationale, as I've just done, what can >> I do to help? > > Play the guinea pig with a tarball that I'll send over. :)
OK, it took me a bit longer. I've put code in CVS that enables concurrent Domainkeys and DKIM signing. Here's a snapshot tarball: http://duncanthrax.net/exim-experimental/exim-cvssnap-2008-03-05.tar.gz /tom -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
