> On Feb 6, 2024, at 16:08, Michael Koch <astroelectro...@t-online.de> wrote:
>
> Removing SDL2 sounds like a very bad idea. There are many examples which are
> using these output devices, and all these examples would be broken. A quick
> search in my book
> http://www.astro-electronic.de/FFmpeg_Book.pdf
> finds about 40 occurences for "-f sdl" or "-f sdl2".
Those examples are broken already before the patch. We are not talking about
that in this thread.
Please reference
https://www.mail-archive.com/ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org/msg155921.html
>
> Michael
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
