On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 01:52:55PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Michael,
> following up on the previous discussion in this thread - if you, > personally, would like to vote for a different option than those > suggested so far, please propose one. The goal of the vote is to find the option which most people prefer. Not the option that I personally prefer. The winning options often are compromises that noone has as their favorite but the team as a whole prefers. You also added 3 options yourself, which i presume you dont all intend to vote for yourself > I am not going to add a large number of options that nobody actually > wants to vote for, as it imposes a burden on the voters who have to > carefully read and compare all the options. The intend of the vote here is to resolve a disagreement we have. Simply omiting opposing options is not how Democracy works You could discuss with others and try to find a smaller set of options that still represent all cases the team may want. I think the 2 main cases from the ones proposed by me are: (that is just my feeling and i cant read peoples minds and there may be other preferrances that should be represented) @@ -82,6 +82,14 @@ The TC has 2 modes of operation: a RFC one and an internal one. If the TC thinks it needs the input from the larger community, the TC can call for a RFC. Else, it can decide by itself. +Each TC member must vote on such decision according to what is, in their view, best for the project. + +If a TC member is aware of being in a conflict of interest with regards to the case, they must announce it +and recuse themselves from the TC discussion and vote. + +A conflict of interest is presumed to occur when a TC member has a personal interest +(e.g. financial) in a specific outcome of the case that differs from what is best for the project. + +If the disagreement involves a member of the TC, that member must recuse themselves from the decision. -If the disagreement involves a member of the TC, that member should recuse themselves from the decision. The decision to use a RFC process or an internal discussion is a discretionary decision of the TC. @@ -82,6 +82,13 @@ The TC has 2 modes of operation: a RFC one and an internal one. If the TC thinks it needs the input from the larger community, the TC can call for a RFC. Else, it can decide by itself. +Each TC member must vote on such decision according to what is, in their view, best for the project. + +If a TC member is aware of being in a conflict of interest with regards to the case, they must announce it +and recuse themselves from the TC discussion and vote. + +A conflict of interest is presumed to occur when a TC member has a personal interest +(e.g. financial) in a specific outcome of the case that differs from what is best for the project. + -If the disagreement involves a member of the TC, that member should recuse themselves from the decision. The decision to use a RFC process or an internal discussion is a discretionary decision of the TC. thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB it is not once nor twice but times without number that the same ideas make their appearance in the world. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
