On 03/03/17 01:16, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 22:00:36 +0300, Kagami Hiiragi wrote: >> + {"row-mt", "Row based multi-threading", OFFSET(row_mt), >> AV_OPT_TYPE_INT, {.i64 = -1}, -1, 1, VE}, > ^ > Woudn't a _BOOL type accept exactly the same ranges and defaults, with > the same behavior, but document itself more nicely? > > It would result in > -row-mt <boolean> E....... Row based multi-threading (default auto) > instead of > -row-mt <int> E....... Row based multi-threading (from -1 to 1) > (default -1) > > (Guessing, untested.) > > Moritz
I copied description of "lossless" flag, but "frame-parallel" and other encoders seems to prefer BOOL, you are right. I'm leaving it up to commiter, it's just s/_INT/_BOOL/. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel