"Clayton E. Cramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tim Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 9:36 AM > Subject: Re: Gun Statistics Expert John Lott Victim of Identity Theft > > > > Charles Curley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 04:31:09AM +1000, Tim Lambert wrote: > > > > While I was over at the Chronicle I came across a March 21 letter from > > > > Lott responding to a February article in the Chronicle. Lott writes: > > > > > > > > Given the space that the article devoted to my use of a pseudonym > > > > in Internet chat rooms, I should note that I stopped using my own > > > > name because discussions often turned personal and resulted in > > > > people calling me at my office with threatening or obnoxious > > > > remarks. In retrospect, either I should not have participated in > > > > chat rooms or I should have continued to do so under my own name. > > > > > > > > Unfortunately for Lott's story, Google has archives of the discussions > > > > he was in and they never turned personal--everybody was polite to > > > > Lott.
> Perhaps I missed too much context of this discussion. Here's an > example of a personal attack that Tim seems to have missed: Your example is from 2003 and is not from a discussion that Lott was involved in. You should look for postings by John Lott and then look at all the follow ups. -- Tim
