J.Pietschmann wrote: > Would you think we should put a Xalan.bat/Xalan.sh file > into the FOP distribution? (or xslt.bar/xslt.sh)
Very good idea. Probably most people create these batchfiles/shellscripts anyway. Might also lead to more people trying the transformation step separately to see where the real problem is... For FOP beginners, it's a real hurdle writing the one-liner that does the transformation alone... BTW: In any case I'd prefer the naming xalan.bat(.sh) I actually have a saxon.sh(.bat), xalan.sh *and* xslt.sh. The latter calls whichever xslt processor my project is currently using. Just my 2 cents. -- Cappelino Informationstechnologie GmbH Arnd Beißner --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
