> I'd say we can't keep something like that within our codebase because it > contradicts the Apache licence. It is entirely possible that someone > sells a product that uses FOP. That wouldn't violate the Apache licence > but the licence of this hyphenation file. Recent discussions on various > Apache mailing lists show that we shouldn't include anything in our > codebase that uses a licence that is not officially approved.
I agree. Should probably take a look at it and if we cannot distribute then remove them. Maybe we could try to make them available in some other way. > I wasn't aware that the hyphenation patterns had their own licences. So, > the obvious conclusion is that we need to check every one of these files > and remove the ones that are not compatible with the Apache licence. > That includes checking where the files came from. > > Just for reference: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Licensing --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
