> With regard to the faq, I just last night sliced out nearly all of the > contents of the dev/faq.xml file. As far as I could tell, it was a duplicate > of an old version of the faq.xml. Those changes are not reflected on the > site yet (I have emailed Jeff to try to find out why not).
It wasn't quite a duplication of the old version. So where should the new/updated information be put? It should be put somewhere so the information can be updated as we a\go and not be lost while still have the old version available. > I don't care a lot about whether we have 1 or 2 developer tabs -- I just > want to clarify what they are, not only so that I know what to put where, > but also so that the web site users understand what they are seeing. It is > confusing enough to have two branches of development, but to have our > documentation mixed up or unclear is a serious problem. A case could be made > that we don't want a developer tab for the maintenance branch, because we > don't really want anyone developing for it. I kind of thought that was what > was going on when I saw the index for it with the title "FOP 1.0 > development". > > I propose the following for a 3-tab structure (I am not ignoring the Alt > Design tab, it just isn't affected by this): > Home > Release Development > 1.0 Development > > If you prefer to combine the developer doc, then: > Home > Development > > Victor Mote --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
