* Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <ti...@debian.org> [20091215 01:18]: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 07:18:21PM +0100, Michael Prokop wrote: > > * Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <ti...@debian.org> [20091214 18:46]:
> > > Homepage: http://phash.org > > > Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=forensics/libphash.git > > > Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/forensics/libphash.git > > The libs look ok to me. But libphash-samples maybe isn't perfect > > yet: > > * Binary names like test_video are calling for problems. > > Are the binaries useful at all or would providing just the > > cpp files be sufficient? > > * Assuming the binaries should be shipped: there are no manpages > > for all the provided binaries. > > * I'd prefer something like phash-samples as package name for a > > package providing binaries instead of lib*. > Actually it doesn't make much sense to have a separeted -samples package. > Binaries are not that useful, have strange names, are really small and there's > no manpage nor even basic instructions about how to use them. That said, I'm > going to ship such examples (maybe only .cpp files) with the -dev package. > Please tell me if you disagree. Sounds good. But instead of shipping the cpp files in the -dev package I'd provide it as libphash-examples or libphash-doc. regards, -mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel