On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 15:46 +0100, Johan Walles wrote:
> Can you post the output of running unhide.rb (from the package of the same
> name) on the system where you're seeing false positives with aptitude?
I checked with unhide.rb ... and it shows no hidden processeds when
aptitude is running (i.e. it is in the package list view... I must admit
that I do not exactly remember what I did back then in aptitude).

I've also checked again with "normal" unhide... and while it shows 1
hidden process... it seems not to be connected with aptitude running.



> The ruby version is much faster than the C version and is much less prone
> to false positives.
But doesn't the ruby version check much less?



Anyway... from that I'd guess we could close this bug.


Cheers,
Chris.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel

Reply via email to