Hi, Em 05-09-2017 18:48, Andreas Beckmann escreveu:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from > 'stretch'. > It installed fine in 'stretch', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails > because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a > Breaks+Replaces relation. I'm learning to keep shared libraries, after researching and getting help from other developers I noticed that I did not put the correct version in Breaks + Replaces, I'll fix it soon. > Why is this .so link in the shared library package and not in > the -dev package? This was a palliative solution to solve the problem on #840489 until the upstream fix. As I have already forwarded this bug to the upstream as described at https://github.com/Aorimn/dislocker/issues/96 but it still has not resolved this. > And please get rid of the insane idea of a libdislocker0.6 > transitional package in sid. Sorry, I did not do it the right way and I will fix it ASAP. greetings, -- Giovani Ferreira 0x78494EF72375A66C _______________________________________________ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel