2011/7/16 Remigiusz Modrzejewski <l...@maxnet.org.pl>: > > On Jul 14, 2011, at 18:17 , Marco Maggesi wrote: > >> I use fossil to host some latex documents and it is very practical for me to >> store in the fossil repository the generated pdf documents together with the >> latex sources. However, as the time passes, these old versions lose >> interest and they make the fossil repository >> uselessly large. I suppose that a similar problem can arise in other cases. >> E.g. when you want to distribute through fossil an up to date compiled >> version of your software. > > While this could be useful, don't expect current Fossil developers to jump on > it. It's been stated that Fossil is not a distribution tool, neither a > package building tool, thus features dedicated to that are out of scope. And > as there are not many frequent contributors, they'd better keep their focus > on the things Fossil aims at. > > On the other hand, this is OSS. You can just go for it :) > > > Kind regards, > Remigiusz Modrzejewski > > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
-- Alexander Vladimirov <idkfa at idkfa dot org dot ru> _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
