On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 1:06 PM, David Gerard<dger...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Too many people attribute to malice what is completely explained by > fuckups. WMF actually does better than most charities of comparable > staffing and funding ... Yes, that's the way I view it too. Most of these attacking threads could be answered with something like "the WMF hasn't quite found its feet and hasn't yet come to terms with the expectations of some members of the community as regards transparency of its internal workings". I wonder what motivates this kind of thread. Do those who regularly seek to pick out any inconsistency or "failure" to communicate actually /like/ Wikipedia, or do they have some grudge against the whole enterprise? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
