* Erik Moeller wrote: >With that said, I also think it's important to remember that Sue has >explicitly affirmed that the development of any technical solution >would be done in partnership with the community, including people >who've expressed strong opposition to what's been discussed to date.
There was a plan for that, "The Wikimedia Foundation, at the direction of the Board of Trustees, will be holding a vote to determine whether members of the community support the creation and usage of an opt-in personal image filter". Pretty logical question to ask, if a majority opposes the feature there is not much point in developing it, and when a majority supports it, development would be much easier. The community would likely have rejected the proposal if it had been given the chance to do so and had been properly informed of criticism, so the community was instead told the matter is already decided, was not informed of any criticism as part of the referendum, and wasn't given the option to clearly express opposition. That's how Sue Gardner understands partner- ship with the community. I don't think the community wants more of it. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjo...@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l