More questions about the FreePascal Language Reference (version 3.2.0), part 4
34. Are macpas LEAVE and CYCLE statements undocumented ?
35. Are macpas ellipsis (...) parameters undocumented ?
36. Is the macpas RETURN statement undocumented ?
37. Shouldn't the macpas "mwpascal" modifier be added to ?
call-modifiers = "register" | "cdecl" | "pascal" | "stdcall" | "safecall" |
"inline" | "mwpascal" .
call-modifiers = "cdecl" | "inline" | "local" | "nostackframe" | "overload" | "pascal" |
"register" | "safecall" | "saveregisters" | "softfloat" | "stdcall" | "varargs" | "mwpascal".
38. Is a <constref-parameter> rule missing ?
constref-parameter = "CONSTREF" identifier-list [ ":" [ "ARRAY" "OF" ]
type-identifier ] .
where
parameter-declaration = value-parameter | variable-parameter | out-parameter | constant-parameter
| out-parameter | constref-parameter .
39. Section 16.7 defines a rule <library> and a rule <exports-clause>
library = library-header ";" [ uses-clause ] block "." .
exports-clause = "exports" exports-list ";" .
The exports-clause rule however doesn't seem to be referenced anywhere in the syntax, so it may
have to be added to the <library> rule ?
40. < recordoperator-definition> = <record-operator-definition> ?
41. Is it correct that <operator-definition> is referenced only in the record <component-list> rule
? I would expect something like an <operator-declaration-part> in various declaration rules.
(to be continued)
Adriaan van Os
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
