I would also add that if you don't need the Unicode support for _some_ reason (albeit doubtful in this day and age), then I liked the old UI in FM 7.2 as being easier on my eyes!
(Although I should ask: did FM 8 use that older UI? I.e., am I misremembering that it changed in FM 9?) Z -----Original Message----- From: Framers <framers-bounces+syed.hosain=aeris....@lists.frameusers.com> On Behalf Of Robert Lauriston Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 12:05 PM To: An email list for people using Adobe FrameMaker software. <framers@lists.frameusers.com> Subject: Re: [Framers] Oh for the Good Old Days The late OmniHelp developer Jeremy H. Griffith also thought FM8 was the classic. On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:30 AM <r...@rickquatro.com> wrote: > > It seems like most software programs have a "golden version" before > feature bloat or performance decline. For me, FrameMaker 8 was that > version. Good performance, especially with FrameScript and acceptable Unicode > support. > Don't get me wrong, there are some things to like about recent > versions, but I loved the simplicity of the pre-Adobe interface. _______________________________________________ This message is from the Framers mailing list Send messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com Visit the list's homepage at http://www.frameusers.com Archives located at http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/ Subscribe and unsubscribe at http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com _______________________________________________ This message is from the Framers mailing list Send messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com Visit the list's homepage at http://www.frameusers.com Archives located at http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/ Subscribe and unsubscribe at http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com
