Mark Kirkwood wrote:
That is a little unfair IMHO - Aryeh has to gather information from
those who use the current system, and @ports is clearly the place for
that! Now he may listen to all, some or none of the points of view he
receives... and that may well determine the success or otherwise of
his ports-ng process - but I don't think he is doing anything wrong.
I agree that a new list (ports-ng or similar) for this would be a good
thing to start *soon*, so that those folks (probably from *this* list)
who are interested can see what is happening and maybe help if they like!
Cheers
Mark
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Information does indeed need to be gathered, and while even the ports
list will only grab a small percentage of FreeBSD users, other options
would likely grab a lot less. Plus, most of the users here are
knowledgeable enough to give decent input. For those of you that don't
like change may I suggest the book that led to
http://www.whomovedmycheese.com/. It is really in all of our best
interest to have the product evolve, the alternative is much worse.
Brian
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
