Miguel Saturnino wrote: > On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 07:34 -0800, Danial Thom wrote: > Well, that's your opinion. For me, FreeBSD is a much better desktop than > Windows -- it runs solid and fast and enables me to be more productive > in my work. Of course, what is good for me might not be so good for > someone else, I guess it depends on your needs. > > Some Linux distros are much easier to setup than FreeBSD, so they might > be a more recommendable desktop for someone with less technical > knowledge.
Ever tried DesktopBSD (www.desktopbsd.org) or PcBSD (www.pcbsd.org)? Unless the Linux-distros provides you with a geek that does the installation for you, I can possible see how they could be easier to setup. Yes, you talk about FreeBSD, but after all both DesktopBSD and PcBSD are basically just preconfigured and pre-packaged versions of FreeBSD. For anyone looking for a BSD-based desktop OS, I highly recommend the two mentioned above. I was surprised to see how extremely userfriendly they were despite being relatively new projects. -- R _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"