On Tuesday 25 September 2007 19:58, Gary Kline wrote: > But trying to parse this from man sed is more than > difficule. And I have yet to find "ba" in the man page. That is > why I asked for some insights rather that to be told to "go read > the man page"; to me, that's dismissing the issue rather than > addressing it.
Hm, my suggestion was wrong... sed is a bit cryptic to learn from the manual page. The manual can be used as a reference, if you alread know sed. So, ba is: branch to the a label for example: my_label: ... bmy_label My points are: If you want to learn sed, you have to invest some time. If you want to ask for an one-liner that does what you want, that's fine too. sed isn't only s/foo/bar/. There is a dc(1) clone in sed, which is at least an amazing accomplishment for sed. You might want (or not) to learn more things about it. > Right. I always do a perl -pi.bak [...] mostly out of habit. > With sed, redirection saved the new output, leaving the original > in ``.'' FWIW, I was using the sed on my Ubuntu server. It is > different from the BSD sed that I've used now/then since 1978. I think this version of sed is different too, since it's part of BSD since 4.4BSD. It may be compatible with the older BSD one. The in-place replacement is a non-standard extension which both BSD and GNU sed share. Cheers Nikos _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
