I prefer pfSense. it started as a fork of M0n0wall and has since
incorporated a LOT more features. it uses pf as its filter base and is fully
expandable using plugins
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Derrick Ryalls" <ryal...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:33 AM
To: "Wojciech Puchar" <woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; "Ivailo Tanusheff"
<i.tanush...@procreditbank.bg>; "Odhiambo ワシントン" <odhia...@gmail.com>;
<owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org>; "Anton" <an...@sng.by>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD as a router
You might also check out monowall. It is a stripped down version of
FreeBSD
that can run off a small flash card and has a web interface.
On Jun 11, 2009 6:05 AM, "Wojciech Puchar"
<woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
wrote:
powerful. > > > > Hmm, PF would be better (not IPF) but I hear ipfw ha
smore features .....
basicly - if you think ipfw can't do something - read manual again ;)
exaggerated, but not very much...
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://l...
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
