In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 300, Issue 10, Message: 6 On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:07:29 +0000 Matthew Seaman <m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > On 05/03/2010 15:51:52, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > The spamtrap is a shiny object for spam, and anything that goes there gets > > blocked for an hour from hitting the low port. I presented this at a > > conference once. > > Having an IPv6-only high-mx seems to terminally confuse most spambots...
I understand why IPv6 would confuse them, but don't follow why higher numbered MXs would be more attractive to them in the first place? Are they assuming a 'secondary' MX will be more likely to accept spam? cheers, Ian _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
