On 16 September 2012 10:37, Odhiambo Washington <odhia...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Chris Rees <cr...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> On 16 September 2012 10:20, Odhiambo Washington <odhia...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Chris Rees <cr...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 16 September 2012 09:32, Odhiambo Washington <odhia...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Chris, >> >> > >> >> > Thanks for this. >> >> > >> >> > Hopefully, you can modify the Wiki to have this information and even >> >> > examples:) >> >> >> >> There are examples on the Wiki page already, but in a confusing order. >> >> I've put in a link, and a tip on how to find UNIQUENAME. >> >> >> >> > Personally, I use `make config` and have never needed to do much with >> >> > /etc/make.conf as regards the ports. >> >> >> >> True, but some people like to share their make.conf around machines :) >> >> >> >> Chris >> > >> > >> > My machines are all identical too, except for parameters related to >> > $hostname, DNS and passwords. >> > I mostly used /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf before, then `make config` >> > and >> > now I believe I am gonna switch to /etc/make.conf but only where I must >> > finely customize. >> > One thing has crossed my mind now: What happens with make -DWITH_* in >> > this >> > new development of optionsNG?? I have manually built ports that way >> > before. >> > And what about those who want to use portinstall -m WITH_OPTx=1 >> > WITH_OPTy=1, >> > etc? >> >> Still works fine for nearly all ports, but just for apache ports there >> appears to be subtle problems with the logic since it's so >> complicated. That's why Olli chose to disable the WITH_ option style >> for Apache, and I think it was the right decision. >> >> I would suggest you learn the new (just as simple) syntax and see how >> you get on with it :) >> >> Chris > > > I was thinking this optionsNG has already been adopted for all ports. > > Thanks for the examples though. They are good enough for me to learn the > ropes.. >
Both syntaxes will work with old and new-style port OPTIONS. Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"