On 27/01/2013 06:34, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > If you needed version control features on your ports tree (especially if > you were regularly contributing changes to ports), getting and updating > your tree through subversion would have some extra features you might > want, but it doesn't sound as if that is the case for you. > > Unless you have a specific reason why portsnap doesn't fit your use > case, it's definitely the way to go for just keeping a ports tree > updated regularly.
Last 10 years I am using cvsup. Any good guide for the transition to subversion ? For ports is easy(portsnap), but I for system update I still have problems saying good bye to old habits and I still use cvsup...:-) Peter _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
