On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Gary Aitken <vagab...@blackfoot.net> wrote:
> I'm having some weird ipfw behavior, or it seems weird to me, and am > looking > for an explaination and then a way out. > > ipfw list > ... > 21109 allow tcp from any to 12.32.44.142 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup > keep-state > 21129 allow tcp from any to 12.32.36.65 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup > keep-state > ... > 65534 deny log logamount 5 ip from any to any > > tail -f messages > Aug 18 23:33:06 nightmare named[914]: client 188.231.152.46#63877: error > sending response: permission denied > > 12.32.36.65 is the addr of the internal interface (xl0) on the firewall > and is the public dns server. > 12.32.44.142 is the addr of the external interface (tun0) which is bridged > on a > dsl line. > > It appears that a dns request was allowed in, but the response was not > allowed > back out. It seems to me the above rules 21109 and 21129 should have > allowed > the request in and the response back out. > > It's possible a request could come in on 12.32.44.142, > which is why 21109 is present; > although I know I am getting failures to reply to refresh requests > from a secondary addressed to 12.32.36.65 > > What am I missing? > > I think you need explict rules like nnnnn allow tcp from 12.32.44.142 to any dst-port 53 out via tun0 setup keep-state careful I'm just winging the syntax, better check the docsa for sure. -- Gary Dunn Open Slate Project http://openslate.org/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
