On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Scott Ballantyne <s...@ssr.com> wrote: > > > I understand why portmaster quits that port.
Because it has no choice. > It does seem like a bit > of over-kill to quit updating ALL ports because one is long > gone. Seems like it could do the others. > So it should continue on and potentially build 1000's of ports with broken linking and dependencies? Portupgrade will do this if you tell it. Try it out and see what fun you can create. -- Adam Vande More _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
