On 07/08/2011 12:20 PM, nathan nolast wrote: > now, i know that the freedombox is going to be used by average individuals > that are not interested in remaining anonymous for what ever reason. But > lets not kid ourself, social networking is social networking... we can > increase the privacy, make strong privacy relation policys, but posting your > pictures and life story on a service is not in any way shape or form ... > logical.
Wanting to form a meaningful and potentially lasting relationship with other humans may not be "logical", but i consider it very valuable. If we build a network that is completely opaque, such that no one can form any lasting relationship across it, we might as well not bother. Even the whistleblower who herself wants to remain anonymous needs be able to reliably identify a trustworthy recipient for her information. She won't be able to do that on a fully-anonymous network. We should not be segregating our work into systems for "normal people" and "dissidents". To make that segregation implies two things: 0) surveillance and corporate- or government-controlled communications for "normal people" is acceptable, and 1) that these categories are fixed, mutually-exclusive, and static -- an individual cannot be both at once, or change from one to the other, either voluntarily or involuntarily. We should support people making connections with other people, creating social bonds and sharing values. We should discourage or prohibit third parties from commoditizing or surveilling these relationships. We should enable people to take a stand publicly for what matters to them. And we should enable people to publish material anonymously, to ensure that even people with significant vulnerabilities have a way to get their important information out to the world. We cannot presume to say that sharing personal stories, opinions, images, movies, jokes, etc. is somehow irrelevant to the creation of a more just society. And we can't afford to ignore the appeal of sharing in making this network something people actively want to participate in, and enjoy using. Networks grow in value the more users they have (by the square of the number of users, if you believe Metcalfe). If we build a darknet that is useful only to handful of international men-of-mystery, it will be a very poor network indeed. --dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss