Op 30-11-12 16:27, Osamu Aoki schreef: > Hi, (somehow this mail has been blocked by spam filter. 4th try) > > This is to show how small is the dependency contamination issue even if we > consider secondary alternative in depends or recommends as the dependency > contamination. (we have over 60,000 packages). > > I understand small number does not mean it does not need to be addressed. If > FSF really think it is important not to have such in our main, this small size > of affected packages opens more chances to solve issues without much negative > impacts, I think. > > (I myself do not wish to change status quo of Debian on this if FSF do not > care > about this. But I also think if we can accomodate FSF wish without much > negatives, why not do it.)
Thanks for your summary. But when we do this, we should not do it half. What I miss are suggestions to non-free or contrib packages. I think we should remove the suggestions too. With regards, Paul van der Vlis. -- Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer, Groningen http://www.vandervlis.nl _______________________________________________ Fsf-collab-discuss mailing list Fsf-collab-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/fsf-collab-discuss