http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58585
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 31762 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31762&action=edit Proposed fix Hi, this patch makes us to look harder for correct virtual table. I walk the stack of binfos with vtables and find first one with matching offset. If I understand thigns right, that should be always the binfo that holds the valid vtable, since these are shared. I will probably need to dive into C++ ABI to double check it.
