https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102939
Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Gabriel Ravier from comment #0)
...
> #define PTR4 PTR3 PTR3 PTR3 PTR3 PTR3 PTR3 PTR3 PTR3 PTR3 PTR3
> #define PTR5 PTR4 PTR4 PTR4 PTR4 PTR4 PTR4 PTR4 PTR4 PTR4 PTR4
> #define PTR6 PTR5 PTR5 PTR5 PTR5 PTR5 PTR5 PTR5 PTR5 PTR5 PTR5
>
> int PTR4 q3_var = 0;
...
Is the use of PTR4 instead of PTR6 or PTR5, intended to provoke comments such
as this one, or are there untold additional related observations?
