https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104172

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dje at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |meissner at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |segher at gcc dot gnu.org
           Priority|P3                          |P2
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code,
                   |                            |wrong-code
   Target Milestone|---                         |9.5

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Wonder what it does in lto1 (e.g. without -ffat-lto-objects) if adapted such
that it actually links.  Because lto1 certainly doesn't have the C++ mangler,
so it must be emitting something really weird in that case.

Reply via email to