https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104712
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to ajrh from comment #2) > Oh drat, reduced test cases are maddening... it's an inline static const > in my original. I'll try to reduce something again. I think even with inline static const, you still have to have a definition depending on how it is used.
