https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105285

--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm <dmalc...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00c4405cd7f6a144d0a439e4d848d246920e6ff3

commit r13-7-g00c4405cd7f6a144d0a439e4d848d246920e6ff3
Author: David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Apr 28 13:49:59 2022 -0400

    analyzer: handle repeated accesses after init of unknown size [PR105285]

    PR analyzer/105285 reports a false positive from
    -Wanalyzer-null-dereference on git.git's reftable/reader.c.

    A reduced version of the problem can be seen in test_1a of
    gcc.dg/analyzer/symbolic-12.c in the following:

    void test_1a (void *p, unsigned next_off)
    {
      struct st_1 *r = p;

      external_fn();

      if (next_off >= r->size)
        return;

      if (next_off >= r->size)
        /* We should have already returned if this is the case.  */
        __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-bogus "path" } */
    }

    where the analyzer erroneously considers this path, where
    (next_off >= r->size) is both false and then true:

    symbolic-12.c: In function âtest_1aâ:
    symbolic-12.c:22:5: note: path
       22 |     __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-bogus "path" } */
          |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      âtest_1aâ: events 1-5
        |
        |   17 |   if (next_off >= r->size)
        |      |      ^
        |      |      |
        |      |      (1) following âfalseâ branch...
        |......
        |   20 |   if (next_off >= r->size)
        |      |      ~            ~~~~~~~
        |      |      |             |
        |      |      |             (2) ...to here
        |      |      (3) following âtrueâ branch...
        |   21 |     /* We should have already returned if this is the case. 
*/
        |   22 |     __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-bogus "path" } */
        |      |     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        |      |     |
        |      |     (4) ...to here
        |      |     (5) here
        |

    The root cause is that, at the call to the external function, the
    analyzer considers the cluster for *p to have been touched, binding it
    to a conjured_svalue, but because p is void * no particular size is
    known for the write, and so the cluster is bound using a symbolic key
    covering the base region.  Later, the accesses to r->size are handled by
    binding_cluster::get_any_binding, but binding_cluster::get_binding fails
    to find a match for the concrete field lookup, due to the key for the
    binding being symbolic, and reaching this code:

    1522  /* If this cluster has been touched by a symbolic write, then the
content
    1523     of any subregion not currently specifically bound is "UNKNOWN". 
*/
    1524  if (m_touched)
    1525    {
    1526      region_model_manager *rmm_mgr = mgr->get_svalue_manager ();
    1527      return rmm_mgr->get_or_create_unknown_svalue (reg->get_type ());
    1528    }

    Hence each access to r->size is an unknown svalue, and thus the
    condition (next_off >= r->size) isn't tracked, leading to the path with
    contradictory conditions being treated as satisfiable.

    In the original reproducer in git's reftable/reader.c, the call to the
    external fn is:
      reftable_record_type(rec)
    which is considered to possibly write to *rec, which is *tab, where tab
    is the void * argument to reftable_reader_seek_void, and thus after the
    call to reftable_record_type some arbitrary amount of *rec could have
    been written to.

    This patch fixes things by detecting the "this cluster has been 'filled'
    with a conjured value of unknown size" case, and handling
    get_any_binding on it by returning a sub_svalue of the conjured_svalue,
    so that repeated accesses to r->size give the same symbolic value, so
    that the constraint manager rejects the bogus execution path, fixing the
    false positive.

    gcc/analyzer/ChangeLog:
            PR analyzer/105285
            * store.cc (binding_cluster::get_any_binding): Handle accessing
            sub_svalues of clusters where the base region has a symbolic
            binding.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
            PR analyzer/105285
            * gcc.dg/analyzer/symbolic-12.c: New test.

    Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com>

Reply via email to