https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036
--- Comment #3 from Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com> --- Hi Andrew! Just a few nitpicks: - In the first testcase you posted, the [] is missing the 0: [0]. - In the reduced test case, you call the pointer to one past the end as 'end'. That is misleading, since 'end' is commonly also used for pointers to the last byte in an array, normally the NUL byte in strings. Using the term 'end' meaning one-past-the-end is likely to end up in off-by-one errors. So much that I found a few of them for exactly that reason this week :) This last point is why I like using array syntax, so I can clrealy specify 'end[1]' and 'past_end[0]', and they are clearly different things. Cheers, Alex
