[Bug target/112919] LoongArch: Alignments in tune parameters are not precise and they regress performance

[xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112919

--- Comment #2 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
On LA464:

13095 with GCC 13.2.0

The best I've got is:

12639 with GCC 14.0.0 + -falign-loops=8 -falign-labels=4 -falign-jumps=4
-falign-functions=16

and I cannot really explain why this is the best.

With the default:

12592 with GCC 14.0.0

So on LA464 the default seems not so bad...