https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113175

--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> IIRC the "signed_rep_t = __int128;" case has really detected a compiler bug,
> so IMO we shouldn't just disable it.

Maybe I should have been explicit: that was just for investigation purposes.

> Maybe my memory is flawed though.

Please link that PR here if you have it!

Reply via email to