https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114634
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |8.5.0
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
Summary|Crash Issue Encountered in |[11/12/13/14 Regression]
|GCC Compilation of Template |Crash Issue Encountered in
|Code with Aligned Attribute |GCC Compilation of Template
| |Code with Aligned Attribute
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Known to fail| |9.1.0
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So GCC 8.5.0 and before we rejected this code:
```
<source>:5:10: error: alignment may not be specified for 'e'
enum { e __attribute__ ((aligned(16))) };
^
```
And GCC trunk rejects it if not inside a template struct so changing
ice-on-valid to ice-on-invalid and marking it as a regression.
Note clang accepts it in both cases though. But this is a gcc extension after
all.
