https://gcc.gnu.org/g:53026cbf08889d00fed34d8667796d22ef8554cf

commit r15-212-g53026cbf08889d00fed34d8667796d22ef8554cf
Author: Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>
Date:   Mon May 6 12:20:17 2024 -0700

    aarch64: Fix gcc.target/aarch64/sve/loop_add_6.c for LLP64 targets
    
    Even though the aarch64-mingw32 support has not been committed yet,
    we should fix some of the testcases. In this case 
gcc.target/aarch64/sve/loop_add_6.c
    is easy to fix. We should use __SIZETYPE__ instead of `unsigned long` for 
the variables
    that will be used for pointer plus.
    
    Committed as obvious after a quick test on aarch64-linux-gnu.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            PR testsuite/114177
            * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/loop_add_6.c: Use __SIZETYPE__ instead
            of `unsigned long` for index and offset variables.
    
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/loop_add_6.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/loop_add_6.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/loop_add_6.c
index e7416ebcded..a530998f54b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/loop_add_6.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/loop_add_6.c
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ double __GIMPLE (ssa, startwith("loop"))
 neg_xi (double *x)
 {
   int i;
-  long unsigned int index;
-  long unsigned int offset;
+  __SIZETYPE__ index;
+  __SIZETYPE__ offset;
   double * xi_ptr;
   double xi;
   double neg_xi;
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ neg_xi (double *x)
   res_1 = __PHI (__BB5: 0.0, __BB3: res_2);
   i_4 = __PHI (__BB5: 0, __BB3: i_5);
   ivtmp_6 = __PHI (__BB5: 100U, __BB3: ivtmp_7);
-  index = (long unsigned int) i_4;
-  offset = index * 8UL;
+  index = (__SIZETYPE__ ) i_4;
+  offset = index * _Literal (__SIZETYPE__) 8;
   xi_ptr = x_8(D) + offset;
   xi = *xi_ptr;
   neg_xi = -xi;

Reply via email to